Multi Intel

from In the multiple intelligence test id did pretty well apart from interpersonal and naturalistic my strongest point was music with the max score of 40 at second was intrapersonal and verbal/linguistic at 32 and my third best ones were logic/maths and visual\spatial. And I think Charles Darwin was smart because he invented the theory of human evolution which was one of the largest scientific advancements/milestones of all time.

Multiple inteligence-KRISHANIA

I found that I was rather lacking in music. But I found that I was  logic and mathematicly smart, acording to the test DUN DUN DUN. I is also certain that in accordance with test results I work well with other people and that I don't know myself very well.

Singular Lacking Areas - Ned

Multiple intelligences was a thing we did.

It wasn't very interesting. As I had done it before it just kind of was...

really boring actually.

But I didn't mind it, and if I looked at the one from last year I'm sure some things would have changed. Like for one thing the "is not cool" meter would have shot through the roof. And I'm pretty sure I'm as "lacking areas" (good grammar trust me) as before.

If Shakespeare took the quiz he'd be mastering visual linguistics as he can word words very good, almost as goodest as I'm.

If Bart Simpson (aliases: bark treeman, bartGAMER1995 and xX_MILHOUSE_SUCKS_Xx) did it, he would be not very mathematical.

I think the quiz was a good idea because then Mr. Tait can see what we think of ourselves.

Multiple intelligence? Or not... DUN DUN DUUUUN! - Tim S

It is virtually and physically impossible to have no talents due to the phenomenon of having no talents to be having one: A talent of being or having no talent, so having no talent means you have probably faded away into the dark abyss called "Oblivion" so think again when you say "I have no talents" because that is physically and logically impossible. For example I am not so good at music, but I found out I am good in the "Visual/spatial" area. When I took the Multiple Intelligence quiz I realized that I have a good sense of how others feel and might react. I did well there, but not in the physical part, I am horribly uncoordinated and can't catch or throw a ball. But I can swim well and smack a hockey ball across the field with a decent swing of my stick. I'm happier than before I took the quiz and now know myself better. I don't really need to improve in music but the physical part I want to improve in. Taking this quiz is a good idea.

Multiple intelligences?-Angus

I enjoyed doing the quiz. It was interesting to see what scored and what other people scored as well. I wasn't surprised to find that my highest was naturalistic but I was surprised to find that according to this quiz, my lowest was mathematical/logical. I think it is better to be really good at lots of things than be extra good at only one thing. I think my one really weak thing is probably logical/mathematical or maybe inter-personal. I would really like to improve on my mathematical/logical things but not so much on inter-personal.I think that my naturalistic skills will help me a lot in science and my body/kinesthetic will help me in sport. I think that having multiple intelligence quiz's in schools is a very good idea because one you and the teacher can find out what you're good at and what you need to work on and also it is fun. I think that for William Shakespear, Roald Dahl and Spike Milligan are all very word smart while Messi, the Williams sisters (tennis stars) and Richie Mcaw are all very body smart.          

Multiple intelligence?

I think I did very well I did think that I had a predictable outcome to it from my point of view I scored well in every thing except nature. I was not surprised about it because I do not want to work with plants and animals and I do not like to watch plant documentaries. I don't really think I need to devolop this because I just don't like watching plant documentaries. I think it is better to have many areas where you are very strong because you are better in many areas because that makes you better at a lot of things. Strengths for Shakespeare. Everything. Charles Darwin. Everything. Bart Simpson. Nothing

Multiple intelligences - Ben_M

I enjoyed doing the multiple intelligence quiz and I am pleased with my results. My highest scoring section was Body/Kinesthetic with 27 and my lowest scores were 16 in both Verbal/Linguistic and Logical/Mathmatical. I am not that worried about developing the low scorers and am happy with how those skills are right now.  I think that Shakespeare's skill would have almost certainly have been Verbal and Musical but Bart's 'Intelligence/Strength' would have been Body/Kinesthetic as he really can't stop himself from fidgeting.

Multiple intellegences - Luke S

The multiple intelligence quiz is a good way to find out about how the students' brains work. the results could be incorporated into a personally customized learning course which focuses on the things that the students enjoy, and does not focus (but still does them) on the things that they do not. I am not proposing that we actually do this, that would be nearly impossible. But we could (to some extent) do this. at least give some optional subjects and some specialized work.

Multiple Intelligence-Felix

Yes there was a predictable outcome especially with my Body/Kinesthetic were I scored very high.  I was quite surprised with the outcome of my Naturalistic test because I scored quite low I am not to worried about this.  I think it is good to have lots of areas the you are doing well at because it gives you a wider range of things to do and you don't feel left out.  Did you know that Charles Darwin really liked classical music and would sit for hours listening to the church choir.

Multiple Intelligence? - Matt

I think that I did fairly well, there was a predictable outcome as I scored very low in sport, naturalism and musical. I wasn't particularly surprised with what I got (from memory, the results were very similar from last year). In my opinion it is better to have a small number of things that you are very good at than many that you are alright at. My one weak area would be naturalism (I wanted to put zeroes in some of those categories) however I am not really worried about this. Charles Darwin would definitely have a lot of logical/mathematical and naturalism. Muhammad Ali would have body/kinesthetic.

Multiple Intelligance-Lucca

I had three scores that were high and they were logical/mathematical, body/kinesthetic and intrapersonal. I was not that surprised about my strengths and weaknesses. I would rather be good at everything instead of being great at one thing because when I go to university I have more chances of getting a good fun job because I was good at heaps of things.  My weak area is music but I'm not worried about that because I don't like doing it and I dint think that it is very important unless you want to be a musician.  You could use multiple intelligence tests to see what kids strengths and weaknesses are and you could help kids that have a lot of low scores. I think Bart Simpson would score himself low on purpose because he is a very distracted silly character.

Multiple Intelligence?-Judd

I think it is better to be doing well in many areas rather than fully excelling in one area because it will give you a lot more oppurtunities at college and way down the track when your applying for jobs. I think that my main weekness is in interpersonal as I only scored low and I prefer to work and play sport individually but I still enjoy the company of others. It is an area that I would like to develop because it is important to have fun with others. I think that the multiple intelligence test would be very good dto be used more in schools because it highlights a childs "strenghts and weakness's" and would give the child a more personalized teaching experience. I think that Muhammad Ali would have not only excelled in sport but in all areas because he came from a poor life style with less oppurtunities so he would have made the most of every opportunity he got. Micheal Jackson would have not only been extremely good at music but would have also been very good at english beacause he needed to wright all the songs he sang.

alien intelligence hUGo

Bonjour M. Tait . Je pense que Micheal jackson peut faire une meilleure marche de la lune que vous. Ne prenez pas trop infraction, mais vous avez juste besoin d'essayer un peu plus difficile .
De Votre sincèrement , Hugo .

I say that if someone is really good at say, swimming, then he should practise his talent. There is no reason to be good at everything but not amazing at anything. you need to have some talents and some areas that you can just avoid.

In my quiz, I am relatively balanced, except for music and I do not see a need for me to be good at music. None of the careers I want to be involved in involve music. Also, just because I am not very good at music, doesn't mean that I can't listen to music.

                                                                  People should just work on what they are good at but you can't just be an amazing sportsman and bad at everything else. Many professional sportsmen become bankrupt because they only focussed on sport and they didn't learn how to save their money.

                                                                 Everybody has they're places that they are strong and places that they are weak. Strengthen you're weak points and show off your strong points; and once you're weak points have been taken care of then show them off too.

Multiple Intelligence - William C

I think that I did all right in my Multiple Intelligence graph. I thought that there was vaguely going to be a predictable outcome, but wasn't sure what it would be. I wasn't particularly surprised by the outcome. I think that it is better to be very good at things across the board rather than excelling in one area. My weak area has to be 'Naturalistic'. I am not particularly worried by this though. I think that this M.I test will give teachers a bigger insight into the pupils life.  

Multiple Intelligence? - Tom B

I thought that my weakness would be music, it was. I also thought that body/kinesthetic would be my strength, it also was. I personally think that it is best to be very good at multiple things then to be absolutely outstanding at one thing. My weak area (music) I am not too worried about because well frankly I don't really care. I think that Bart Simpson has many strengths. But in The Simpsons he just doesn't show them off. One of his strengths would be body/kinesthetic because he does lots of sate-boarding, baseball and he even did American Football! I think that one of his weaknesses would be naturalist. I think this because when Lisa (his sister) starts talking about plants and stuff like, he doesn't exactly pay a lot of attention.

Multiple intelligence - Jake Breslin

Multiple intelligence

My strengths were in Maths / Logical and Intra-personal.
I predicted my results and I was correct with the outcome excelling In mental and intelligence category's but doing worse in sporty / athletic category's. I think it is good to excel in one area as long as you like whatever you're excelling in.
I was very weak in the environmental category only scoring 15 points. I want to develop on my musical part by learning an instrument.

Multiple intelligence tests could be used in schools to help set more specific work for a student for example if I excelled in sport but had terrible mathematical skills teacher would see that and assign more maths work until I was even or close et my sport level.

I see Verbal, Logical / Mathematical as important skills as they help you pass tests and are basic skills you need.

Overall these tests are very interesting to do and see the results. By schools using these tests everything works better the student will improve on subjects that they lack in and it will become easier to learn.

Multiple intelligence - the dark truth... - Harry

Yesterday, General Tait of the 7/8T battalion, Wellesley College army, carried out a top-secret test on his human guinea pigs, the class. You know what I'm talking about here. Outlawed even by the KGB, known and feared by the bravest spies, it was the dreaded Multiple Intelligence Exercise! 

Okay, maybe I was exaggerating a little bit. It was really just a double-sided sheet of paper, similar in appearance to a harmless worksheet, but hiding terrifying secrets that have driven many a human to insanity. I thought I did rather well, especially on the Verbal and Linguistic front, achieving a score of 38. Surprisingly, my lowest score was for the Logical and Mathematical section, on which I got the still alright score of 28. Having said that, however, I believe that more skills at good levels is better than one astronomically high score and scraping the bottom of the barrel with the rest. I believe our glorious leaders at the head of the Party* can utilise this information best by grouping people with relative skill sets together and deploying them to areas where they'll be most effective (border patrol, cafeteria supply team, forced labour toilet cleaners, etc.). If our elite team of commandos, the Wellesley First XI, captured the head of the FBI, James Clapper, and forced him to undergo this terrifying assessment, I believe they'd get quite a surprise! For example, along with the obvious Interpersonal and Logical/Mathematical categories, he may have a secret musical talent! Mr Clapper will also probably have a high Linguistic/Verbal score, due to the amount of paperwork and talking his job requires.

*of teachers at Wellesley

Multiple intelligence 

I crused through the Multiple intelligence test however strangely enough I couldn't decide on where I was on the graph. I am sure Mahamad Ali would have no problem deciding that he was very body smart. And I am sure Charles Darwin would quickly note that he was extremely logic smart.In the end I decided that I was good at a bit of everything. I am also having a fantastic time in 7/8T, what about you guys?

Multiple Intelligence? - Anish Hota

I went really well with my test and it came out to be visual/spatial on the top and naturalistic on the bottom. My strengths is visual and spatial, like art, looking things far away, things like that. William Shakespeare's strengths are music, composing, and his strengths in these are so much better than others that he is world famous.

Multiple Intelligence_ArchieC

My Multiple Intelligence was not what I probably would of thought because I got thirty in Body/Kinesthetic which I didn't think I would score that high on, and nineteen on Logical/Mathematical which I thought I would get a higher score on. I don't think it is good to excell in one paticular area, but to be more average and get say, mid twentys in them all than get high thirtys and mid teens. I think Micheal Jackson would excell in Musical, Body/Kinesthetic and Verbal/Linguistic because as a dancer/singer you have to be good with Verbal stuff and Musical stuff.

Multiple Intelligence? - Atharva

My graph turned out just as I expected, which is surprising because last year my graph was the opposite of what I thought it would be. My weak area is definitely PE, but I am not worried about that, because I never was good at it. I excel in maths most of the time.  

Multiple Intelligence?-Tom A

I think I did alright in the M.I we did. I scored myself round thirty every time my highest being in Verbal and Body. I think that William Shakespeare would be best at Verbal, Musical and Interpersonal where as Bart Simpson would be Body, Intrapersonal and Musical.

Multiple Intelligence- Noah L

I think that I did well on the multiple intelligence graph. There wasn't really a predictable outcome for my graph. I wasn't that surprised about my graph. I think it is better to have a bunch of things your good at but not amazing, then being amazing at one thing. My strengths were: body/kinesthetic and visual/spatial. My weak area was naturalistic, but I am not worried about it though. I think that William Shakespeare's strength would be interpersonal or verbal. 

Multiple Intelligence? - Mr T

Good morning boys.  Yesterday in class you had an opportunity to complete a 'Multiple Intelligence' Quiz.  How did you go?  Was there a predictable outcome (on your graph)?  Were you surprised? What is/are your strength(s)?  Do you think it is better to have one particular area where you absolutely excel or many areas where you are doing very well?  What is your one 'weak' area?  Is this area something that you actually want to develop or one where you are just not worried?  How could we use this Multiple Intelligence testing to greater advantage in schools? Which intelligence(s) would you see as being strength(s) for say... William Shakespeare? Charles Darwin? Muhammad Ali? Queen Elizabeth 2? Michael Jackson? Bart Simpson?