For me I was never in to the book. When/if we do a line where we stand across the classroom of what we thought of the book, I will certainly be right next to the window. This type of book is not my type at all. If I read this book way back in 1954 I may have had a different review. I understand that the book was written back in the 90s but I still do not like it at all.
Overall this book is ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE. I would not reccomend this book.
It was bad but not terrible because there were some good bits. The Mechanical Hound had more potential but there wasn't much action or doing stuff, just talk talk talk.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree. It seems like a book for philosophers, or people who like to talk and think about things, not 11-12 year old boys who want some action.
ReplyDeleteIt was terrible for me. The book seemed to go on and on and on and on.
ReplyDeleteHugh agrees!!! :-)
ReplyDeleteDon't you think terrible is a very strong word
ReplyDeleteYes I think terrible is a strong word but I think strongly as in 'terrible' strongly about this book.
ReplyDeleteSheesh, You're a bit harsh don't you think?
ReplyDeleteCome on guys, it wasn't that bad now, was it?
why are you called the weather man? What happened to the crumpeteer?
ReplyDelete